NLP case study · Apple Inc.

Do the climate claims match the innovation?

Apple’s 2024 Environmental Progress Report makes ambitious claims about carbon neutrality, recycled materials, clean energy and product design. This study tests those claims against a second corpus: Apple’s sustainability-related U.S. patents from 2023–2024.

≈0.73
Mean Ada-002 ESG–patent similarity reported in Appendix A5
Strongest backing
Materials, circularity and energy efficiency
Weakest backing
Water/resource-use and some supply-chain themes
Overall reading
Partially but meaningfully supported; gaps are not equivalent to deceptive intent
01 · The case

Why Apple is a useful greenwashing test case.

The report positions Apple at the intersection of high-profile sustainability messaging and substantial R&D activity. That makes it possible to compare what the company says with a technical evidence source that is independent of the ESG prose itself.

The “talk vs walk” problem

Corporate ESG reports increasingly use language such as “carbon-neutral products,” “closed-loop manufacturing” and “100% recycled materials.” The research problem is that current NLP systems often detect linguistic patterns without verifying whether claims correspond to observable activity.

Prior research cited in the report highlights four constraints: scarce labelled greenwashing data, small domain-specific supervised datasets, limited use of external evidence such as emissions/patents/lifecycle data, and no unified definition of greenwashing. The study’s contribution is to bring ESG disclosure and patent evidence into one semantic comparison.

2030Apple’s stated carbon-neutrality target across products and supply chain.
2,536U.S. patents attributed to Apple in 2023 in the report’s case-study context.
40–57%Share of corporate environmental claims described as misleading in the cited ACCC finding.
94%Investors in the cited PwC survey who believe companies exaggerate ESG performance.
Why the case is contested.
The report notes Apple’s “first carbon-neutral product” positioning for Apple Watch Series 9, its recycled-material and clean-energy messaging, and the removal of wall chargers as an e-waste intervention. It also cites a 2025 German court ruling that found a carbon-neutral product label misleading because of insufficient verification of offsets.
Research question.
How closely do Apple’s sustainability claims in ESG reporting align with its real technological developments, particularly sustainability-related patent activity?
02 · Research design

Two corpora. One evidence-alignment pipeline.

The workflow combines extraction, domain NLP, semantic matching, topic modelling and a composite risk score. It is deliberately multi-stage so the final interpretation is not based on a single classifier output.

1,661
ESG sentences retained
From Apple Environmental Progress Report 2024 after cleaning.
179 → 177
Patents retrieved → retained
Active U.S. patents published 1 Jan 2023–31 Dec 2024.
10
GRI-aligned themes
Including Energy & Emissions, Materials & Circular Economy, Waste & Recycling and Product Responsibility.
1,661
Matched ESG–patent pairs
Each ESG sentence paired with its most semantically similar patent abstract.
STEP 1

Collect

Apple Environmental Progress Report 2024 + GRI Content Index 2024 + Lens.org green-technology patents.

STEP 2

Clean

PyPDF2/pandas extraction, lower-casing, punctuation/URL/stop-word removal, spaCy lemmatisation, duplicate/null removal and ≥25-character sentence segmentation.

STEP 3

Tag

Fine-tuned DistilBERT NER, TF-IDF, KeyBERT, GRI keyword mapping and BART zero-shot theme classification.

STEP 4

Embed

MiniLM, MPNet, ESG/EnvironmentalBERT, ClimateBERT and OpenAI Ada-002; cosine similarity to the closest patent.

STEP 5

Score

Semantic similarity, environmental claim/action indicators and theme coverage combined into alignment and risk metrics.

Patent selection

The Lens.org search used active Apple Inc. U.S. patents in green-technology CPC families including C02F, F24F, A61K, C08L, B65D, Y02A, Y02E, Y02W and Y02P.

Patent abstracts were rewritten into DWPI-style summaries using GPT-5 Mini to reduce the language gap between technical patent writing and ESG disclosure language.

Focused subset test

The study first compared a narrower “Smarter Chemistry + Product Longevity” subset with the full ESG report.

This experiment tests whether product-specific disclosure would improve patent alignment before selecting the corpus used for the rest of the analysis.

Post-cleaning data structures

ESG dataset

ESG_Sentence, clean_text, Keyword_Theme, ZeroShot_Theme, Claim_Flag, Action_Label.

Patent dataset

DWPI_ESG_Abstract, clean_text, class_cpc.symbol.

Merged dataset

Similarity, GRI_Theme, Claim_Flag, Action_Label, Alignment_Score, Greenwashing_Risk.

TF-IDF max 5,000 featuresTruncated SVD · 100 componentsall-MiniLM-L6-v2all-mpnet-base-v2EnvironmentalBERTClimateBERTtext-embedding-ada-002BERTopic · MPNet + UMAP + HDBSCAN + c-TF-IDF
03 · Finding one

Generic NER failed. Domain NER found the ESG vocabulary.

The first benchmark shows why sustainability-specific NLP matters: the generic spaCy transformer baseline returned zero on the ESG entity labels used by the study, while the fine-tuned DistilBERT model learned the domain vocabulary.

spaCy NER baseline metrics
Figure 1 · spaCy en_core_web_trf baseline: precision, recall and F1 all reported as 0.0.
DistilBERT NER epoch training log
Figure 2 · Fine-tuned DistilBERT training log across eight epochs.
Training behaviour

F1 rose from 0.37 to about 0.70 before falling.

The results discussion describes F1 increasing from roughly 0.37 to a best value around epoch 7, followed by a decline. The training screenshot records epoch-7 F1 ≈ 0.7007.

Methodology summary

Precision 0.86 · Recall 0.81 · F1 0.83

Elsewhere, the methodology reports seqeval precision 0.86, recall 0.81 and F1 0.83 for the fine-tuned ESG-DLT-NER model. These are preserved as separate reported evaluation contexts rather than merged into one number.

Top 15 ESG entities
Figure 4 · The 2,670 extracted entities include renewable energy, carbon footprint, greenhouse-gas emissions, clean energy, carbon removal, water, waste and carbon neutrality.

The extracted entities reveal what Apple’s ESG narrative is made of.

From 1,661 ESG sentences and the patent corpus, the model extracted 2,670 ESG entities. The most frequent concepts concentrate around renewable energy, carbon footprint, emissions, electricity and efficiency.

renewable energycarbon footprintrenewable electricitygreenhouse gas emissionsenergy efficiencycarbon removal
04 · Finding two

The full ESG report matched patents better than the narrow subset.

MiniLM-L6-v2 was used for the first corpus-choice experiment. The full report outperformed the focused two-section subset on both lexical overlap and semantic similarity.

Focused subset versus full report
Figure 3 · Full report: lexical overlap 0.125 vs 0.083; semantic similarity 0.062 vs 0.047.

Broader context produced more patent overlap.

Lexical · focused
0.083
Lexical · full
0.125
Semantic · focused
0.047
Semantic · full
0.062

The study therefore used the full ESG report for downstream analysis.

Distribution of MiniLM ESG patent semantic similarity
Figure 5 · Most MiniLM pairwise similarities cluster around 0.4–0.6, with a small ≥0.9 tail.
What those tails mean.
The report interprets near-perfect matches as direct lexical overlaps such as “power consumption” and “energy storage.” Scores below 0.3 are associated with aspirational or vague ESG statements with weaker technical correspondence.
05 · Finding three

Apple talks most about climate and energy; the patent language is more technical.

TF-IDF, KeyBERT and zero-shot GRI tagging show a disclosure corpus dominated by climate/energy themes, while BERTopic later shows patents clustering around batteries, packaging, energy efficiency and wireless power.

Top TF-IDF keywords ESG versus patents
Figure 6 · TF-IDF keywords expose the lexical gap between ESG narrative language and patent terminology.
GRI aligned ESG theme distribution
Figure 7 · Energy & Emissions and Stakeholder Engagement dominate the zero-shot theme distribution, followed by Product Responsibility.
GRI claim significance table
Figure 8 in the report · Claim-status similarity test by GRI theme. The source caption says “Top 15 ESG Entities Extracted,” but the image presents the statistical significance table.

Only Waste & Recycling crossed the significance threshold.

ClimateBERT classified ESG sentences as environmental claims or not. A two-sample t-test comparing patent similarity by claim status found a significant difference only for Waste & Recycling (p = 0.00025).

The report interprets this as stronger technical grounding for waste-related claims, while Energy & Emissions, Water Use and Product Responsibility were not more patent-aligned than general text.

Waste & Recycling · p = 0.00025
06 · Finding four

“Similarity” changed dramatically by embedding model.

The study compares general sentence encoders with ESG-specific models. The distributions are not directly interchangeable: MiniLM is conservative, EnvironmentalBERT is extremely high, and Ada-002 sits between them.

Similarity distributions by model
Figure 9 · MiniLM low/varied, Ada-002 balanced, EnvironmentalBERT very high.

Ada-002 was selected for the main alignment analysis.

The report describes EnvironmentalBERT’s raw values as unrealistically high and MiniLM as low and variable. Ada-002 was preferred for a more balanced distribution and broader semantic generalisation.

This selection matters because the later risk score inherits the scale and calibration of the embedding model.

Ada versus SBERT normalized scatter
Figure 10 · Moderate normalized correlation between Ada and SBERT: r = 0.48.
Normalized similarity heatmap
Figure 11 · Theme-level normalized similarity heatmap.
Normalized similarity bar chart
Figure 12 · SBERT is higher in several themes, especially Product Responsibility.
Model agreement after normalization.
The scatter plot reports r = 0.48. A statistical comparison gives t = −0.877, p = 0.388, indicating no significant overall difference between normalized Ada-002 and SBERT theme-alignment trends in the report.
07 · Finding five

Action-oriented ESG sentences were slightly closer to patents.

ESG-BERT / EnvironmentalBERT action classification separates action statements from general text. When plotted against Ada-002 similarity, action-labelled sentences sit slightly higher.

Ada similarity by Action versus None
Figure 13 · Action-labelled ESG sentences show similarity around 0.77, slightly above non-action text.

Concrete language is easier to substantiate technically.

The report uses action classification to distinguish vague language from action-driven statements. The slightly higher patent similarity for “Action” sentences is presented as support for using the classifier alongside cosine similarity.

It is not treated as a standalone greenwashing label; it becomes one component in the later composite alignment score.

08 · Finding six

Topic modelling exposes where disclosure and R&D actually overlap.

BERTopic uses MPNet embeddings, UMAP, HDBSCAN and class-based TF-IDF to discover latent themes in the ESG and patent corpora.

Top ESG topics from BERTopic
Figure 14 · ESG topics center on energy, recycling, materials and water.
Top patent topics from BERTopic
Figure 15 · Patent topics include power/device consumption, batteries, vehicle systems, second-bus control and packaging/wireless systems.
Where the corpora meet.
Energy efficiency and recycling appear in both ESG and patent topics, supporting the view that part of Apple’s environmental narrative has a technical R&D analogue.
Where patents are the wrong evidence source.
Stakeholder engagement and climate partnerships lack obvious patent equivalents. The report notes that these are more likely to be evidenced through news releases, public commitments, memoranda, supplier records or other non-patent sources.
09 · Alignment & risk

The framework measures an evidence gap, then converts it into a risk indicator.

The final score is intentionally weighted toward semantic similarity, with smaller contributions from claim/action consistency and theme coverage.

60%
Semantic similarity
Cosine similarity between an ESG sentence and its closest patent.
25%
Claim–action consistency
Whether the statement is identified as an environmental claim/action.
15%
Theme coverage
How well ESG statements are represented across GRI-aligned patent themes.
Alignment Score = 0.60 × Semantic Similarity + 0.25 × Claim–Action Consistency + 0.15 × Theme Coverage
Greenwashing Risk Score = 1 − Alignment Score
Average alignment by broad theme
Figure 16 · Broad Ada-002 themes: Circularity 0.776, Climate 0.769, Energy 0.767, General 0.762, Resources 0.753.
Average alignment by zero-shot theme
Figure 17 · Materials & Circular Economy 0.781 is strongest; Water & Resource Use 0.755 is lowest.
Materials & Circular Economy
0.781
Circularity
0.776
Transportation & Logistics
0.776
Waste & Recycling
0.776
Product Responsibility
0.774
Energy & Emissions
0.768
Water & Resource Use
0.755
10 · Classifier validation

The Random Forest flags statements, but its labels are heuristic.

Because the study has no verified greenwashing ground truth, the classifier labels are generated from the similarity distribution itself: top-quartile similarity is tagged aligned and bottom-quartile similarity is tagged potential greenwashing.

Random Forest classifier evaluation
Figure 18 · Holdout classification report, confusion matrix and five-fold cross-validation output.

Final reported performance: about 0.69 holdout F1 and 0.68 ± 0.02 CV F1.

The results text reports F1 = 0.69 on the holdout set and F1 = 0.68 ± 0.02 across five folds. The screenshot shows weighted F1 ≈ 0.696 and macro CV F1 ≈ 0.677 ± 0.024.

An earlier methodology paragraph states five-fold CV F1 = 0.78. The case study keeps that earlier statement in the methodology record but uses the later Figure 18 evaluation as the final reported model result.

Heuristic labels, not verified greenwashing ground truth
11 · Risk distribution

Most statements sit in the middle, not at “clean” or “greenwashed” extremes.

The predicted risk distribution is broad, with most statements concentrated between 0.3 and 0.7 and comparatively few close to zero or one.

Distribution of predicted greenwashing risk
Figure 19 · Predicted greenwashing risk (0 = aligned, 1 = high risk).

The high-risk pattern is mostly about evidence type.

The report says high-risk sentences frequently concern future targets, certifications and partner initiatives—for example AWS water stewardship or recycled-material commitments. These depend on policy, third-party verification or supplier behaviour rather than Apple-owned patents.

This is why the study’s strongest interpretation is a communication–innovation gap, not proof of purposeful greenwashing.

Case-study conclusion

Apple’s ESG reporting appears largely credible — but the evidence is uneven.

The study finds clear patent support for materials, circularity, energy efficiency and parts of recycling. Water-use, resource-management, supply-chain and governance claims show weaker patent substantiation. The report concludes that many apparent gaps arise because those claims are implemented through policy, suppliers, certification or partnerships rather than patentable R&D.

12 · Supporting evidence

The appendix sharpens the story behind the aggregate scores.

These additional figures show the vocabulary split, model calibration, claim-status comparisons and correlation between similarity and classifier indicators.

13 · Statement-level evidence

What the model actually flags.

The source report includes statement-level tables for high-risk cases, low-risk cases and the top ESG–patent matches. They are retained below as evidence tables rather than mixed into the main narrative.

High-risk pattern

Future goals, certifications and partnerships. The report gives AWS Water Stewardship and recycled-material targets as examples of claims that may rely on third parties or suppliers rather than patents.

Low-risk pattern

Statements with close technical analogues in packaging, product design, materials recovery, device efficiency and other patentable engineering areas.

Top-pair validation

The report says the highest-similarity ESG–patent pairs are logically credible on human inspection, providing a qualitative check on the semantic matching.

Appendix A8 · High-Risk ESG Statements — full source table
ESG_SentenceGreenwashing_IndexSimilarityPredicted_Prob
Certify all Apple-owned data centers to the Alliance for Water Stewardship (AWS) Standard by 2025.15Ongoing We’ve certified five data centers since 2021, and 20 suppliers since 2017 to the AWS Standard.1.00.7380.0032238337749398
While certain matters discussed in this report may be significant, any significance should not be read as necessarily rising to the level of materiality used for the purposes of complying with the U.S.0.99444632207848700.7410.0032238337749398
In 2022, we introduced these innovations for iPhone, iMac, iPad, and Apple Watch.0.92224850909881000.780.0032238337749398
The data and modeling approaches are checked for quality and accuracy by the Fraunhofer Institute in Germany.2024 Environmental Progress Report 95 Engagement and Advocacy Environmental Initiatives Data Introduction Contents Appendix Appendix C2024 Environmental Progress Report 96 Engagement and Advocacy Environmental Initiatives Data Introduction Contents Appendix A: Corporate facilities energy supplement B: Apple’s life cycle assessment methodology C: Assurance and review statements Net comprehensive carbon footprint, facilities energy, carbon, waste, paper, and water data (Apex) Product carbon footprint (Fraunhofer Institute) Supplier Clean Energy Program (Apex) Supplier Energy Efficiency Program (Apex) Packaging fiber and plastic footprint (Fraunhofer Institute) D: Environment, Health and Safety Policy E: ISO 14001 certification Report notes End notes Appendix C Net comprehensive carbon footprint, facilities energy, carbon, waste, paper, and water data (Apex) INDEPENDENT ASSURANCE STATEMENT To: The Stakeholders of Apple Inc.0.92224850909881000.780.0032238337749398
Apple currently only allows for clean electricity sources to address electricity for product use when part of a residual grid factor, in markets where there is sufficient data to ensure that the clean electricity is not already claimed.0.92224850909881000.780.0032238337749398
We assess natural gas and electricity usage at each of these site types — as well as research and development facilities — auditing how we perform and using best practices for energy management to reduce our loads.0.9203972831249720.7810.0032238337749398
11 Because we’re committed to accuracy and transparency, we regularly refine our product life cycle assessment model and sources of data.0.91669483117729600.7830.0032238337749398
DESIGNING PRODUCTS FOR DURABILITY iPhone 7, which was introduced in 2016, still had monetary value for Apple Trade In in the United States as of April 2024.2024 Environmental Progress Report 41 Engagement and Advocacy Data Appendix Introduction Contents Environmental Initiatives Apple 2030 Resources Smarter Chemistry iPhone (1st generation) SIM tray iPhone 4 SIM tray Battery Haptics Rear cameraiPhone 7 SIM tray Battery Haptics Rear camera Main logic board Display Splash, water, and dust resistant: IP67* Sapphire crystal lens coveriPhone X SIM tray Battery Haptics Rear camera Main logic board Display Bottom speaker Enclosure Splash, water, and dust resistant: IP67* Sapphire crystal lens cover Surgical-grade stainless steeliPhone 13 SIM tray Battery Haptics Rear camera Main logic board Display Bottom speaker Top speaker Enclosure TrueDepth camera Splash, water, and dust resistant: IP68* Sapphir e crystal lens cover Surgical-grade stainless steel Ceramic ShieldiPhone 15 SIM tray Battery Haptics Rear camera Main logic board Display Bottom speaker Top speaker Enclosure TrueDepth camera Back glass** Main microphone‡ Splash, water, and dust resistant: IP68* Sapphire crystal lens cover Aerospace-grade aluminum Ceramic Shield 2007 2010 2016 2018 2021 2023 Repairable at retail stores, Apple Authorized Service Providers, and central repair locations Features to enhance durability* iPhone 7, iPhone X, iPhone 13 and iPhone 15 models are splash, water, and dust resistant and were tested under controlled laboratory conditions.0.91299237922962000.7850.0032238337749398
In 2023, we expanded the capabilities of Daisy, which can now disassemble 29 iPhone models into discrete components.0.91299237922962000.7850.0032238337749398
We aim to one day make our products solely from responsibly sourced recycled and renewable materials — while maintaining our same rigorous standards of quality and durability.0.91114115325578300.7860.0032238337749398
Review of Apple’s systems for quantitative data aggregation.0.90928992728194500.7870.0032238337749398
Detailed and accurate information drives this process, including which chemicals our suppliers use as they make our products and how they store, handle, and consume each one.0.90620455065888200.7870.0065571671082731
We have two goals in this collaboration: to improve the carbon footprint models associated with leading nodes of integrated circuit production, and to use these models to identify carbon reduction opportunities for the entire integrated circuits industry.0.90620455065888200.7870.0065571671082731
• The 13-inch MacBook Air with Retina display (2018) and later models allow for battery replacement with a stretch-release adhesive, improving repairability.0.90188502338659300.7910.0032238337749398
Within those programs, we build the networks and systems required to maintain a continued engagement process with our suppliers.0.90178094819975100.7890.0073362729782708
The forest management plans required to achieve or maintain certification limit harvest volumes to sustainable levels.0.90131259924259100.7460.0938422608628181
As an example, Apple has joined the CoolClimate Network, a research partnership of the University of California, Berkeley, that motivates and empowers individuals and organizations to make low-carbon choices.0.90003379741275500.7920.0032238337749398
When the outside air is too warm to cool the servers alone, it draws from indirect evaporative cooling.0.89818257143891800.7930.0032238337749398
The criteria we set for chemicals in materials — and how our suppliers use them — help establish even more stringent standards around health and safety across the electronics industry.0.89499311962901200.7910.0106696063116041
• In 2023, Apple committed to using 100 percent recycled cobalt in all Apple-designed batteries by 2025.35Material and key challenges Progress Copper Technical properties Supply chains Scale• In 2023, we introduced 100 percent recycled copper in the fin stack of the heat sink for 16-inch MacBook Pro, which helps regulate thermal performance.0.89262889351740400.7960.0032238337749398
Appendix A9 · Low-Risk ESG Statements — full source table
ESG_SentenceGreenwashing_IndexSimilarityPredicted_Prob
To improve the accuracy of monitoring and reporting, and verifying the projects’ carbon removal impact, Apple is deploying innovative remote sensing technologies using Space Intelligence’s CarbonMapper and HabitatMapper and Upstream Tech’s Lens.0.00.7970.965588969239039
These suppliers make up 95 percent of Apple’s direct spend for materials, manufacturing, and assembly of our products worldwide.0.05340358634762620.7510.9998935964403170
They also have the option to do so online through programs like Apple Trade In.0.05340358634762620.7510.9998935964403170
The bulk of Apple’s recycled content data is certified and thus verified by a third party.0.05340358634762620.7510.9998935964403170
2 million phones each year, helping us recover more valuable materials for recycling.0.05340358634762620.7510.9998935964403170
Introduction and objectives of work Apex Companies, LLC (Apex) was e ngaged by Apple Inc .0.05710603829530180.7490.9998935964403170
In addition, Apple also funds a solar power system to provide power to public healthcare centers in the state of Ondo, with excess energy serving households in the surrounding region.Philippines: Apple helped fund a new rooftop solar installation at an educational institution in Bataan.0.0605935396134310.7520.9901258216063260
• Opportunity to attend a leading university’s business executive leadership program focused on supply chain and growth.0.06080849024297760.7470.9998935964403170
We also recognize that energy use at our employees’ homes likely increased during this period.0.06080849024297760.7470.9998935964403170
10 We retired 70, 000 m etrics tons of carbon credits — 53,000 from the Chyulu Hills project in Kenya and 17,000 from the Cispatá Mangrove project in Colombia.0.06080849024297760.7470.9998935964403170
This independent statement should not be relied upon to detect all errors, omissions or misstatements that may exist.0.06265971621681550.7460.9998935964403170
https://energinet.dk/data-om-energi/deklarationer- og-csr/lokationsbaseret-deklaration-miljodeklaration/ .6 Apple took operational control of the building in October 2015 and converted it to a data center that began servicing customers in March 2017.0.06429599156110670.750.9901258216063260
We’re committed to phasing out our use of PFAS and engaging with all our supply chain partners to restrict PFAS from our products and manufacturing processes.0.06429599156110670.750.9901258216063260
Apple launched the initiative in 2019 to provide underresourced communities with renewable electricity while supporting economic growth and social impact.0.06429599156110670.750.9901258216063260
We’ve already reduced emissions by more than 55 percent since 2015, even as revenue grew by 64 percent during that same eight-year period.0.06571595341877040.7510.986591744321617
These were extrapolated for the w hole category.0.06614721753494450.7490.9901258216063260
7 million square meters of landfill space.0.06636216816449110.7440.9998935964403170
2 Apple is carbon neutral for corporate emissions as of April 2020.0.06636216816449110.7440.9998935964403170
6 Beginning in fiscal year 2020, we updated our methodology for calculating emissions from employee commute to reflect employees working from home during COVID-19.0.06666252021096140.7520.9835691065609460
The continu ed validity of this certificate may be verified under “Certified Company Search” NSAI (National Standards Authority of Ireland), 1 Swift Square, Northwood, Santry, Dublin 9, Ireland T +353 1 807 3800 E: info@nsai.ie www.nsai.ie 2024 Environmental Progress Report 110 Engagement and Advocacy Environmental Initiatives Data Introduction Contents Appendix Report notes About this report This report is published annually and focuses primarily on fiscal year activities.0.06821339413832910.7430.9998935964403170
Appendix A10 · Top ESG–Patent Pairs — full source table
ESG_SentenceMost_Similar_PatentSimilarityClimateBERT_ClaimTypeESGBERT_EnvCategoryESGBERT_ActionESGBERT_WaterESGBERT_BiodiversityClaim_FlagAction_LabelGRI_ThemeModel_Source
We include retail bags, all finished goods boxes (including plastic content in labels and in-box documentation), packaging sent to our customers as part of Apple Trade In, AppleCare packaging for whole units and service modules (with the exception of plastics needed to protect items from electrostatic discharge), and secondary packaging of Apple products and accessories sold by Apple.packaging may include base box comprising cardboard cardboard corrugate disposed within base box may tray receiving product also may comprise cardboard constructing base box tray fold flat without destructive mean type configuration retains high end reception end product product packaging encouraging proper recycling customer decides dispose packaging0.845nononenonenonenoneTRUENoActionMaterials and Circular EconomyAda002
We include retail bags, all finished goods boxes (including plastic content in labels and in-box documentation), packaging sent to our customers as part of Apple Trade In, AppleCare packaging for whole units and service modules (with the exception of plastics needed to protect items from electrostatic discharge), and secondary packaging of Apple products and accessories sold by Apple.packaging may include base box comprising cardboard cardboard corrugate disposed within base box may tray receiving product also may comprise cardboard constructing base box tray fold flat without destructive mean type configuration retains high end reception end product product packaging encouraging proper recycling customer decides dispose packaging0.845nononenonenonenoneTRUENoActionMaterials and Circular EconomyAda002
Our goal to remove plastic from packaging includes retail bags, all finished goods boxes (including plastic content in labels and in-box documentation), packaging sent to our customers as part of Apple Trade In, AppleCare packaging for whole units and service modules (with the exception of plastics needed to protect items from electrostatic discharge), and secondary packaging of Apple products and accessories sold by Apple.packaging may include base box comprising cardboard cardboard corrugate disposed within base box may tray receiving product also may comprise cardboard constructing base box tray fold flat without destructive mean type configuration retains high end reception end product product packaging encouraging proper recycling customer decides dispose packaging0.844yesnoneactionnonenoneTRUEActionMaterials and Circular EconomyAda002
Apple’s goal to remove plastic from packaging includes retail bags, all finished goods boxes (including plastic content in labels and in-box documentation), packaging sent to our customers as part of Apple Trade In, AppleCare packaging for whole units and service modules (with the exception of plastics needed to protect items from electrostatic discharge), and secondary packaging of Apple products and accessories sold by Apple.packaging may include base box comprising cardboard cardboard corrugate disposed within base box may tray receiving product also may comprise cardboard constructing base box tray fold flat without destructive mean type configuration retains high end reception end product product packaging encouraging proper recycling customer decides dispose packaging0.842yesnoneactionnonenoneTRUEActionMaterials and Circular EconomyAda002
4 Beginning in fiscal year 2022, we expanded our packaging goal boundary to better reflect our impact to include retail bags, all finished goods boxes (including plastic content in labels and in-box documentation), packaging sent to our customers as part of Apple Trade In, AppleCare packaging for whole units and service modules (with the exception of plastics needed to protect items from electrostatic discharge), and secondary packaging of Apple products and accessories sold by Apple.packaging may include base box comprising cardboard cardboard corrugate disposed within base box may tray receiving product also may comprise cardboard constructing base box tray fold flat without destructive mean type configuration retains high end reception end product product packaging encouraging proper recycling customer decides dispose packaging0.837yesnoneactionnonenoneTRUEActionMaterials and Circular EconomyAda002
54 Our packaging design guidelines apply to retail packaging and shippers, and exclude plastic-based components, wraps, and adhesives.packaging may include base box comprising cardboard cardboard corrugate disposed within base box may tray receiving product also may comprise cardboard constructing base box tray fold flat without destructive mean type configuration retains high end reception end product product packaging encouraging proper recycling customer decides dispose packaging0.836nononenonenonenoneTRUENoActionMaterials and Circular EconomyAda002
These include recyclable protective films (RPFs) that safeguard products during manufacturing and reusable trays used to securely deliver modules through assembly sites.packaging may include base box comprising cardboard cardboard corrugate disposed within base box may tray receiving product also may comprise cardboard constructing base box tray fold flat without destructive mean type configuration retains high end reception end product product packaging encouraging proper recycling customer decides dispose packaging0.835yesnoneactionnonenoneTRUEActionProduct ResponsibilityAda002
retail packaging by weight.packaging may include base box comprising cardboard cardboard corrugate disposed within base box may tray receiving product also may comprise cardboard constructing base box tray fold flat without destructive mean type configuration retains high end reception end product product packaging encouraging proper recycling customer decides dispose packaging0.828nononenonenonenoneTRUENoActionMaterials and Circular EconomyAda002
These emissions sources vary widely and require use of diverse technologies and solutions to abate.energy storage system battery cell battery present technology may include abatement system addressing effluent vapor produced cell block system may include support structure configured address vented effluent may include oxidant catalyst entrainment system assist abatement0.827noenvironmentalnonenonenoneTRUENoActionEnergy and EmissionsAda002
This effort incorporates cutting- edge technologies, including optimal water management, modular filtration and recovery units, acid recovery systems, and evaporators.energy storage system battery cell battery present technology may include abatement system addressing effluent vapor produced cell block system may include support structure configured address vented effluent may include oxidant catalyst entrainment system assist abatement0.827noenvironmentalactionwaternoneTRUEActionWater and Resource UseAda002
We’re also addressing transportation-related emissions through product and packaging design that drives reduced packaging mass and volume, creating boxes that use space more efficiently.packaging may include base box comprising cardboard cardboard corrugate disposed within base box may tray receiving product also may comprise cardboard constructing base box tray fold flat without destructive mean type configuration retains high end reception end product product packaging encouraging proper recycling customer decides dispose packaging0.827yesenvironmentalactionnonenoneTRUEActionEnergy and EmissionsAda002
Lithium Regulatory barriers Availability and access Scale• In 2023, 24 percent of the lithium, allocated using mass balance, shipped in our batteries came from certified recycled sources, including post-industrial scrap and post-consumer scrap from end-of-life batteries — a first for Apple.PROGRESS ACROSS OUR 15 PRIORITY MATERIALS Tantalum Regulatory barriers Availability and access Supply chains• We’re actively investigating recovery approaches from end-of-life electronics to develop further use of recycled material for capacitors.lithium metal battery improved dimensional stability presented along method manufacture lithium metal battery incorporate anode cell reduces dimensional change charging discharging anode cell includes container first portion second portion form enclosed cavity first portion electrically conductive chemically stable lithium metal second portion permeable lithium ion chemically stable lithium metal anode cell also includes anode comprising lithium metal disposed within cavity anode contact first portion second portion cavity configured volumetric expansion contraction anode charging discharging accommodated entirely therein0.825yesenvironmentalactionnonenoneTRUEActionMaterials and Circular EconomyAda002
We use innovative approaches to this process, including machine learning to digitize data from chemical tests so this information can be more easily assessed.system method provide action recognition analytics tool use manufacturing health care service shipping retailing similar context machine learning action recognition utilized determine cycle process action sequence object like one sensor stream sensor stream include limited one video sensor frame thermal sensor frame infrared sensor frame three dimensional depth frame analytics tool provide process validation anomaly detection process quality assurance0.825nononeactionnonenoneTRUEActionGeneral / OtherAda002
The microgrid system with battery storage manages the renewable energy generation and the building’s energy use; optimizes demand management, load shifting, and frequency regulation services; and ensures uninterrupted energy reliability against local grid outages.2024 Environmental Progress Report 86 Engagement and Advocacy Environmental Initiatives Data Introduction Contents Appendix Facilities renewable energy projects To reach 100 percent renewable electricity for Apple’s own facilities, Apple has helped create 1,647 M W of renewable energy around the world.energy storage system battery cell battery present technology may include abatement system addressing effluent vapor produced cell block system may include support structure configured address vented effluent may include oxidant catalyst entrainment system assist abatement0.824noenvironmentalactionnonenoneTRUEActionEnergy and EmissionsAda002
We strive for efficiency in sourcing and utilizing materials, relying on recycled and renewable materials for our products and packaging, and reducing scrap.packaging may include base box comprising cardboard cardboard corrugate disposed within base box may tray receiving product also may comprise cardboard constructing base box tray fold flat without destructive mean type configuration retains high end reception end product product packaging encouraging proper recycling customer decides dispose packaging0.823yesenvironmentalactionnonenoneTRUEActionEnergy and EmissionsAda002
We seek technological solutions and supplier engagement to abate emissions from these sources.energy storage system battery cell battery present technology may include abatement system addressing effluent vapor produced cell block system may include support structure configured address vented effluent may include oxidant catalyst entrainment system assist abatement0.822yesenvironmentalactionnonenoneTRUEActionEnergy and EmissionsAda002
This work has expanded to component manufacturers who create modules used in the final assembly of our products.electronics module according embodiment present technology may include circuit board first surface electronic component extends second surface opposite first surface circuit board may include tie bar residual extending sidewall circuit board beyond width across first surface module may also include overmold least partially encapsulating circuit board overmold may characterized first height extending normal first surface circuit board across width circuit board overmold may extend laterally beyond width along length first surface overmold may define region tie bar residual characterized recessed height overmold may define notch recessed outer edge overmold notch may located across tie bar residual0.82nononeactionnonenoneTRUEActionProduct ResponsibilityAda002
Department of Energy Federal Energy Conservation Standards for Battery Chargers.system method modular charging vehicle described example method may include connecting vehicle charger using charging plug interface includes first pair conductor connected alternating current terminal board alternating current direct current converter vehicle second pair conductor connected terminal battery vehicle charging battery vehicle via direct current flowing second pair conductor concurrent charging battery via alternating current flowing first pair conductor power board alternating current direct current converter0.819noenvironmentalnonenonenoneTRUENoActionEnergy and EmissionsAda002
This joint venture to commercialize patented technology that eliminates direct greenhouse gas emissions from the traditional smelting process.energy storage system battery cell battery present technology may include abatement system addressing effluent vapor produced cell block system may include support structure configured address vented effluent may include oxidant catalyst entrainment system assist abatement0.819yesenvironmentalactionnonenoneTRUEActionEnergy and EmissionsAda002
14 · Practical application

Where the framework could be useful.

The report positions patent-based validation as one component of a broader ESG verification workflow.

ESG platforms

Integrate patent-based verification into ESG data products to supplement disclosure-only scoring.

Investors & auditors

Use external technical evidence to support confidence, triage claims and simplify sustainability auditing.

Regulators

Surface potentially unsubstantiated or misleading statements for deeper review before they spread through the market.

15 · Limitations & future work

Patents are useful evidence. They are not the whole ESG system.

The report is explicit about the limits of semantic alignment and heuristic labels.

Limitations

  • ESG narrative language and patent technical language differ, lowering similarity even when genuine innovation exists.
  • There is no verified labelled greenwashing dataset; the Random Forest uses heuristic labels.
  • Future commitments may not yet appear in patent filings.
  • Model accuracy depends on embedding quality and would require tuning for other industries or languages.

Future work

  • Use human ESG experts to relabel data and validate claim interpretations.
  • Add emissions, supplier, financial and media evidence.
  • Track ESG–patent alignment longitudinally as commitments become actions.
  • Apply the framework across sectors to identify industry-level patterns.
Research context

Sources and academic provenance.

The case study is based on the submitted AIB551 Natural Language Processing assessment and its cited datasets/references.

Singapore University of Social Sciences logo

AIB551 · Natural Language Processing

NameKaranam Niharika
SUSS PI NOB2511473
Submission Date03/11/2025

Declaration in the source: AI tools including ChatGPT were acknowledged as part of the preparation and development of the project.

Datasets

  • Apple Inc. (2024a), Apple Environmental Progress Report 2024.
  • Apple Inc. (2024b), GRI Content Index 2024.
  • Lens.org (2025), Apple Inc. active U.S. patents from 2023–2024 in sustainable CPC classes.

Selected contextual evidence

  • Apple (2023), first carbon-neutral products.
  • IFI Claims (2024), 2023 U.S. patent assignee ranking.
  • Wired (2020), iPhone 12 charger removal and e-waste.
  • ACCC (2022) and PwC (2023) greenwashing / investor-confidence statistics.
APA references from the report
  1. Calamai, A., Hübner, J., & Webersinke, N. (2025). Corporate greenwashing detection in text: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12345.
  2. Chang, T., Jin, G. Z., & Luca, M. (2024). Greenwashing in earnings calls: Evidence from FinBERT. Sustainable Finance Alliance.
  3. Lublóy, Á., de Koning, D., & Rousseau, R. (2025). Quantifying firm-level greenwashing: A systematic review. Journal of Environmental Management, 330, 117122.
  4. Santarlasci, L., Webersinke, N., & Hübner, J. (2025). Seeing through green: NLP for identifying true green patents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.07455.
  5. Schimanski, S., Lehmann, J., & Weber, M. (2023). Bridging the gap in ESG measurement: Using NLP to quantify E, S, G communication. SSRN Electronic Journal.
  6. Zhao, L., Liu, W., & Qian, Z. (2023). Detecting greenwashing in ESG domains via NLP: A case study in pharma. KDIR Conference Proceedings.
  7. Apple. (2023). Apple unveils its first carbon neutral products. https://www.apple.com/newsroom
  8. IFI Claims. (2024). Top 50 U.S. Patent Assignees 2023. https://www.ificlaims.com
  9. TechXplore/AFP. (2025). Apple accused of greenwashing in US lawsuit. https://techxplore.com
  10. The Verge. (2023). Apple’s first ‘carbon neutral’ products are a red herring. https://www.theverge.com
  11. Wired. (2020). The iPhone 12 ships without a charger. Will it curb e-waste? https://www.wired.com
  12. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. (2022, March). Greenwashing internet sweep: Findings report. Government of Australia.
  13. BloombergNEF. (2024, May). ESG assets exceed $30 trillion as investors push for sustainability transparency. BloombergNEF.
  14. PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2023, November). 2023 Global investor survey: Investors demand reliable ESG information. PwC Global.
  15. Apple Inc. (2024a). Apple environmental progress report 2024. https://www.apple.com/environment/pdf/Apple_Environmental_Progress_Report_2024.pdf
  16. Apple Inc. (2024b). GRI content index 2024. https://www.apple.com/ca/environment/reports/gri/
  17. Lens .org. (2025). Patent search: Apple Inc. (active 2023–2024, sustainable CPC classes).
  18. https://www.lens.org/lens/search/patent/list?q=class_cpc.symbol:C02F*%20OR%20class_cpc.symbol:G21F*%20OR%20class_cpc.symbol:G05D*%20OR%20class_cpc.symbol:F25B*%20OR%20class_cpc.symbol:F24F*%20OR%20class_cpc.symbol:A61K*%20OR%20class_cpc.symbol:A61Q*%20OR%20class_cpc.symbol:C11D*%20OR%20class_cpc.symbol:C08K*%20OR%20class_cpc.symbol:C08L*%20OR%20class_cpc.symbol:B65D*%20OR%20class_cpc.symbol:Y02A*%20OR%20class_cpc.symbol:Y02T*%20OR%20class_cpc.symbol:Y02E*%20OR%20class_cpc.symbol:Y02W*%20OR%20class_cpc.symbol:Y02P*&p=0&n=10&s=_score&d=%2B&f=false&e=false&l=en&authorField=author&dateFilterField=publishedDate&orderBy=%2B_score&presentation=false&preview=true&stemmed=true&useAuthorId=false&j.must=US&applicant.must=APPLE%20INC&patentStatus.must=active&publishedDate.from=2023-01-01&publishedDate.to=2024-12-31